China admits to organ trade from executed prisoners
By Carol Divjak
29 December 2006
www.wsws.org
After years of denial, the Chinese government finally admitted that
China's booming transplant business is heavily dependent on organs
harvested from the country's large number of executed prisoners.
Deputy Health Minister Huang Jiefu told a surgeons' conference in the
southern city of Guangzhou in November: "Apart from a small number from
traffic [accident] victims, most of the organs come from cadavers of
executed prisoners". He called for a stricter rules and better recording
to curb the organ trade.
Regulations adopted in 1984 state that organs of executed prisoners may
be harvested only if the prisoner or his family consent or if relatives
are unwilling to take away the corpse. Once harvested, however, there is
little regulation governing the distribution of the organs or the
procedures by which patients get a preferential transplant.
Huang did not call for an end to this gruesome business, but pointed to
tighter regulations now under consideration. "We want to push for
regulations on organ transplants to standardise the management of the
supply of organs from executed prisoners and [to] tidy up the medical
market," he told the Caijing magazine. Huang claimed the measure would
help improve China's image.
Many of the transplants, however, are carried out in military hospitals
run by the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA), where there are few controls.
The PLA is still heavily dependent on its business enterprises,
including the lucrative transplant trade for foreigners.
The scale of the business was highlighted in November by a health
ministry spokesman who criticised "transplant tourism". Rich foreigners
arrive on tourist visas and jump the long queue of Chinese citizens
waiting for transplants. Each year some two million Chinese need a
transplant, but only 20,000 people, mainly the wealthy or privileged,
receive one.
Dr Wang from Beijing's prestigious Tongren Hospital told the San
Francisco Chronicle that until recently his hospital openly advertised
the buying and selling of organs. Foreigners typically pay a hefty
premium for transplants in China, but the operation is still cheaper
than in the West.
The London-based Times this month cited an article in the Israeli Maariv
newspaper reporting that dozens of people were travelling to China each
month for transplants. One patient who received a kidney transplant told
the newspaper: "A Chinese sentenced to death saved my life."
China has no system of voluntary organ donation. Estimates put the
proportion of organ transplants from executed prisoners at more than 90
percent. The Falun Gong organisation has accused the Chinese government
of taking organs from their members being held in prison or labour
camps. To date, there is no proof of these accusations, which Beijing
has denied.
Executed prisoners provide a huge pool of potential organs. Some 68
crimes are covered by the death penalty in China, including non-violent
offences such as tax fraud, embezzling state property and accepting bribes.
Amnesty International has estimated that 3,000 people were sentenced to
death in China in 2005 and more than 1,770 people were executed. The
true figure is believed to be much higher. In March 2004, a senior
member of the National People's Congress announced that China executes
around 10,000 people each year. Even the lower estimate represents more
than 80 percent of the 2,148 executions reported worldwide in 2005.
The official acknowledgment of the trade in prisoner organs came only
weeks after China announced tighter controls on the death penalty. Some
legal experts speculate that the changes could reduce the number of
prisoners executed by a third.
Under the new legislation, which comes into effect in January 2007, all
death penalties handed down by provincial courts will be reviewed and
ratified by the Supreme Peoples Court. Death sentences and executions
still remain a state secret, however, so the impact of the review
process will be difficult to access.
Even with this reform, Amnesty International warned that those facing
the death penalty were unlikely to receive a fair trial. Trials in China
are marked by lack of access to lawyers, no presumption of innocence,
political interference in the legal process and admission of evidence
extracted under torture.
Many of those sentenced to death come from the rising number of poor,
who are driven to desperate acts to look after themselves and their
families. Arrest and incarceration all place further burdens on the
families of the convicted, who must pay for all prison expenses. In the
case of an execution, the family must not only pay for the funeral, but
the cost of the bullet used. All of this is part of the systematic
humiliation and penalisation of family members, who are regarded as
partly responsible for the crime.
The Stalinist regime in Beijing also uses the death penalty as a means
of terrorising anyone opposed to its dictatorial rule. In early
December, Chen Tao, one of tens of thousands of farmers who demonstrated
against the construction of a dam in Sichuan in December 2005, was
secretly executed. Chen killed a policeman in fierce clashes with
police. His lawyer angrily protested that the government executed his
client without even informing him.
Like the transplant trade, execution has become a profitable business. A
report in USA Today in June noted that firing squads were being phased
out in favour of lethal injections using specially equipped "death vans"
that shuttle from town to town.
The manufacturers promoted their "death vans" by pointing to the savings
for poor localities that would otherwise have to build execution
facilities. They hailed the virtues of local executions as a crime
deterrent. The same company also makes bulletproof limousines for the
country's expanding wealthy elite.
Chinese authorities claim that lethal injections are more "humane". But
a researcher for Amnesty International, Mark Allison, contends that the
injections facilitate the illegal trade in prisoners' organs.
"Injections leave the body intact and require the participation of
doctors, so organs can be extracted in a speedier and more effective way
than if the prisoner is shot," he said.
Despite the new regulations, there is no doubt that this grisly trade is
set to continue and expand
http://pt.indymedia.org/ler.php?numero=112925&cidade=1
--
Pedro Jorge Pereira
ecologista social
ecotopia [at] tvtel [dot] pt | pjp [at] gaia [dot] org [dot] pt | (+351) 93 4476236
docks suburban diaries - divagasons do interlúdio
http://dsd02.blogspot.com/
projecto "Be the Change you Want to See ... "
http://thechange2004.blogspot.com/
gaia http://gaia.org.pt _ portugal indymedia http://pt.indymedia.org/
--
Pedro Jorge Pereira
GAIA - Grupo de Acção e Intervenção Ambiental
pjp [at] gaia [dot] org [dot] pt | ecotopia [at] tvtel [dot] pt | pedro_sarda [at] peacemail [dot] com
(+351) 93 4476236
gaia - porto: porto [at] gaia [dot] org [dot] pt
projecto "Be the Change you Want to See ... "
http://thechange2004.blogspot.com/
"Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed."
Mahatma Gandhi